2004 - Rated PG - 1 hr 48 min
Director: Brad Silberling
Starring: Jim Carrey, Jude Law, Liam Aiken, Emily Browning, Timothy Spall, Catherine O'Hara, Billy Connolly, Meryl Streep, Luis Guzman, Jamie Harris, Craig Ferguson, Jennifer Coolidge, Jane Adams
Hey, little Emily Browning... before you were that girl from Sucker Punch! As the eldest Beaudelaire child, she's quick-witted and self-assured here. Also caring to her kinda-weird younger siblings. The family unit formed here is believable, which makes the movie really work.
With a cast of big-named stars parading by, it would otherwise be very hard to focus on the point of this movie. Carrey's Olaf is big, bold, and pretty eccentric. Over the top, as is his usual. Billy Connolly gives a nice, heartwarming Uncle Monty and Meryl Streep's worry-wort Aunt is a joy to watch as well. But the focus stays nicely on the kids, who pass through this Series of Unfortunate Events with gusto. Poor things.
I did like this one -- although I haven't read the books -- and I had hoped the franchise would carry on, turning more of the books into movies. It doesn't seem like that's going to happen (seven years later), so if I want all those questions answered -- what is the deal with the spyglass? -- I guess I'll have to read the books. Maybe they'll make good bedtime stories for my kids some day.
Showing posts with label Timothy Spall. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Timothy Spall. Show all posts
Sunday, May 22, 2011
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
Movie #393 - The Last Samurai
The Last Samurai
2003 - Rated R - 2 hr 34 min
Director: Edward Zwick
Starring: Tom Cruise, Ken Watanabe, Billy Connolly, William Atherton, Chad Lindberg, Tony Goldwyn, Masato Harada, Timothy Spall
First of all, on a side note, I never noticed before how Timothy Spall is in everything. Seriously, the man shows up all over the place. I had no clue.
Okay, so he's in this too, but not really in a huge part. So I'll focus on the actual plot. This movie's got the feeling of a Gladiator-like epic, just set in Japan instead. Tom Cruise's Nathan Algren suffers just about as much as Maximus and learns most of his important lessons while imprisoned. An American officer sent to training the Japanese army to withstand rebel Samurai attacks in 1876, Algren is a drunk with a death wish. He gets captured by the Samurai warriors and winds up training with them. When they release him, he's caught between the old and new worlds of Japan, forced to decide which side he'll stand on.
This is a great story, told very well, albeit a bit long. But honestly, it's one movie where so much happens that you don't notice how long it really is. Even having Tom Cruise as the star didn't dissuade me from it (I'm really not a big fan, in case you haven't noticed yet) and I think he does well, capturing the essence of this tortured war hero. Good stuff, all around.
2003 - Rated R - 2 hr 34 min
Director: Edward Zwick
Starring: Tom Cruise, Ken Watanabe, Billy Connolly, William Atherton, Chad Lindberg, Tony Goldwyn, Masato Harada, Timothy Spall
First of all, on a side note, I never noticed before how Timothy Spall is in everything. Seriously, the man shows up all over the place. I had no clue.
Okay, so he's in this too, but not really in a huge part. So I'll focus on the actual plot. This movie's got the feeling of a Gladiator-like epic, just set in Japan instead. Tom Cruise's Nathan Algren suffers just about as much as Maximus and learns most of his important lessons while imprisoned. An American officer sent to training the Japanese army to withstand rebel Samurai attacks in 1876, Algren is a drunk with a death wish. He gets captured by the Samurai warriors and winds up training with them. When they release him, he's caught between the old and new worlds of Japan, forced to decide which side he'll stand on.
This is a great story, told very well, albeit a bit long. But honestly, it's one movie where so much happens that you don't notice how long it really is. Even having Tom Cruise as the star didn't dissuade me from it (I'm really not a big fan, in case you haven't noticed yet) and I think he does well, capturing the essence of this tortured war hero. Good stuff, all around.
Monday, May 16, 2011
Movie #391 - The King's Speech
The King's Speech
2010 - Rated R - 1 hr 58 min
Director: Tom Hooper
Starring: Colin Firth, Geoffrey Rush, Helena Bonham Carter, Guy Pearce, Michael Gambon, Derek Jacobi, Timothy Spall
Biopics like this always make me nervous there'll be excessive characterization of real people from history. (Well, it's kind of a biopic, though not really. The point remains, there are historic figures here, played by modern actors.) But since even the Queen herself has given a nod to this movie (which portrays her father, King George VI), I watched it with confidence.
This was my second viewing (just got it for Mother's Day!) and I loved it even more. It's so heavily focused on the relationship built between Bertie and Lionel that the speech problem takes a back seat. The goal is to help him overcome his difficulty with speech, it's true, but the friendship heals him much more than the therapy does! Carter, as always, is spot on as a young Queen Mum. Firth... well, he won the Oscar, so there you go. And Geoffrey Rush is also outstanding here. With three strong performances, I can see how this took Best Picture this year.
2010 - Rated R - 1 hr 58 min
Director: Tom Hooper
Starring: Colin Firth, Geoffrey Rush, Helena Bonham Carter, Guy Pearce, Michael Gambon, Derek Jacobi, Timothy Spall
Biopics like this always make me nervous there'll be excessive characterization of real people from history. (Well, it's kind of a biopic, though not really. The point remains, there are historic figures here, played by modern actors.) But since even the Queen herself has given a nod to this movie (which portrays her father, King George VI), I watched it with confidence.
This was my second viewing (just got it for Mother's Day!) and I loved it even more. It's so heavily focused on the relationship built between Bertie and Lionel that the speech problem takes a back seat. The goal is to help him overcome his difficulty with speech, it's true, but the friendship heals him much more than the therapy does! Carter, as always, is spot on as a young Queen Mum. Firth... well, he won the Oscar, so there you go. And Geoffrey Rush is also outstanding here. With three strong performances, I can see how this took Best Picture this year.
Movie #385 - Harry Potter & The Dealthy Hallows (Part I)
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1
2010 - Rated PG-13 - 2 hr 26 min
Director: David Yates
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Bill Nighy, Richard Griffiths, Julie Walters, Bonnie Wright, Fiona Shaw, Alan Rickman, Ralph Fiennes, Helena Bonham Carter, Jason Isaacs, Tom Felton, Timothy Spall, Michael Gambon, Robbie Coltrane, Brendan Gleeson, David Thewlis, John Hurt, Frances de la Tour, Rhys Ifans, Imelda Staunton, Miranda Richardson, Warwick Davis
The casts of these movies keep getting longer and longer! But what a great cast of main characters this franchise has built, honestly! I have to say that almost everyone chosen, even the most lovable characters and the most hated villains, are so spot-on cast that I have no complaints! And who doesn't think Carter is the craziest Bellatrix Lestrange there could ever be?
Anyway, back to this review. The seventh book took a lot of heat for being reeeeallly boring for the first half, likes its warming up for the epic battle at its conclusion. But I've always argued that it should be exactly that. Rowling's writing has always been an excellent mimic for the feeling of her hero, and as Harry feels aimless in his wanderings for the horcruxes, we get to feel it right along with him. I've always felt that to be a strength of her style, a treat for us readers. If you disagree, you're clearly just reading for the juicy bits.
So this movie also took a lot of heat for "dragging" and while I agree that it probably didn't need to be over two hours by quite so much, I think it captures that aimless feel of the book. We get to see our favorite trio turn on one another and really feel the pressure, the burden placed on their shoulders at such a young age. It's fitting, too, that we should sit and feel pressured, burdened by their struggle. It's like the full-experience kind of movie and book we should expect from such a big franchise.
And I, for one, am a big fan.
2010 - Rated PG-13 - 2 hr 26 min
Director: David Yates
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Bill Nighy, Richard Griffiths, Julie Walters, Bonnie Wright, Fiona Shaw, Alan Rickman, Ralph Fiennes, Helena Bonham Carter, Jason Isaacs, Tom Felton, Timothy Spall, Michael Gambon, Robbie Coltrane, Brendan Gleeson, David Thewlis, John Hurt, Frances de la Tour, Rhys Ifans, Imelda Staunton, Miranda Richardson, Warwick Davis
The casts of these movies keep getting longer and longer! But what a great cast of main characters this franchise has built, honestly! I have to say that almost everyone chosen, even the most lovable characters and the most hated villains, are so spot-on cast that I have no complaints! And who doesn't think Carter is the craziest Bellatrix Lestrange there could ever be?
Anyway, back to this review. The seventh book took a lot of heat for being reeeeallly boring for the first half, likes its warming up for the epic battle at its conclusion. But I've always argued that it should be exactly that. Rowling's writing has always been an excellent mimic for the feeling of her hero, and as Harry feels aimless in his wanderings for the horcruxes, we get to feel it right along with him. I've always felt that to be a strength of her style, a treat for us readers. If you disagree, you're clearly just reading for the juicy bits.
So this movie also took a lot of heat for "dragging" and while I agree that it probably didn't need to be over two hours by quite so much, I think it captures that aimless feel of the book. We get to see our favorite trio turn on one another and really feel the pressure, the burden placed on their shoulders at such a young age. It's fitting, too, that we should sit and feel pressured, burdened by their struggle. It's like the full-experience kind of movie and book we should expect from such a big franchise.
And I, for one, am a big fan.
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
Movie #262 - Harry Potter & the Half-Blood Prince
Harry Potter & the Half-Blood Prince
2009 - Rated PG - 2 hr 39 min
Director: David Yates
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Michael Gambon, Jim Broadbent, Bonnie Wright, Helena Bonham Carter, Timothy Spall, Alan Rickman, Robbie Coltrane, Warwick Davis, Maggie Smith, David Thewlis, Gemma Jones
The end of this movie still gets me. And every time, I remember reading the end of this book in my hotel room in Italy and looking at Mike and saying, "WHAT?! Are you KIDDING ME?!"
JK Rowling wasn't kidding, despite the various websites that sprung up between books 6 and 7 arguing the contrary.
And although the end of the movie is different, it's nice that it doesn't leave the same ambiguity as the book. No Fawkes flying into the sky imagery. No confusing colors of light deployed from Snape's wand to throw you off track. Honestly, read it. You'll see what I mean.
Of course, this movie has to cut out lots as well, since it's too large to comfortably fit everything into a film adaptation. I think this is one of the better ones, but I'm always biased because I've read the books so I know what's going on. If you watch this without reading the books, I can't promise you'll catch everything.
I guess what I'm saying is, go read the darn books already.
2009 - Rated PG - 2 hr 39 min
Director: David Yates
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Michael Gambon, Jim Broadbent, Bonnie Wright, Helena Bonham Carter, Timothy Spall, Alan Rickman, Robbie Coltrane, Warwick Davis, Maggie Smith, David Thewlis, Gemma Jones
The end of this movie still gets me. And every time, I remember reading the end of this book in my hotel room in Italy and looking at Mike and saying, "WHAT?! Are you KIDDING ME?!"
JK Rowling wasn't kidding, despite the various websites that sprung up between books 6 and 7 arguing the contrary.
And although the end of the movie is different, it's nice that it doesn't leave the same ambiguity as the book. No Fawkes flying into the sky imagery. No confusing colors of light deployed from Snape's wand to throw you off track. Honestly, read it. You'll see what I mean.
Of course, this movie has to cut out lots as well, since it's too large to comfortably fit everything into a film adaptation. I think this is one of the better ones, but I'm always biased because I've read the books so I know what's going on. If you watch this without reading the books, I can't promise you'll catch everything.
I guess what I'm saying is, go read the darn books already.
Movie #260 - Harry Potter & the Goblet of Fire
Harry Potter & the Goblet of Fire
2005 - Rated PG-13 - 2 hr 37 min
Director: Mike Newell
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Timothy Spall, Bonnie Wright, Tom Felton, Robert Pattinson, Jason Isaacs, Robbie Coltrane, Michael Gambon, Warwick Davis, Clemence Poesy, Maggie Smith, Alan Rickman, Brendan Gleeson, Miranda Richardson, Gary Oldman, Shirley Henderson, Ralph Fiennes
The biggest book so far and it's the choppiest movie. Maybe I'm overly critical because this is my favorite book in the series. I'm not even partial to Hermione's S.P.E.W. subplot but I'm still mad it's not in the movie.
Still, they do a great job bringing the big stuff to life - the TriWizard Tournament, the Voldemort confrontation. Although I didn't like the cerebral quality they gave to the maze. It's supposed to be monsters, not their own personal demons. Anyway, aside from this, my only other critique is the director's apparent mis-steps in some seasons. Hermione overreacts here and there, Dumbledore basically attacks Harry in one scene - acts that are largely out of character to the seasoned HP fan, maybe not so for the untrained eye. It feels like Newell didn't get a full grasp of some of the relationships here.
And also, everyone needs a bloody haircut in this movie...
Oh yeah. Screw you, Twilight, for making Cedric Diggory a vampire. We had him first, you jerks.
2005 - Rated PG-13 - 2 hr 37 min
Director: Mike Newell
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Timothy Spall, Bonnie Wright, Tom Felton, Robert Pattinson, Jason Isaacs, Robbie Coltrane, Michael Gambon, Warwick Davis, Clemence Poesy, Maggie Smith, Alan Rickman, Brendan Gleeson, Miranda Richardson, Gary Oldman, Shirley Henderson, Ralph Fiennes
The biggest book so far and it's the choppiest movie. Maybe I'm overly critical because this is my favorite book in the series. I'm not even partial to Hermione's S.P.E.W. subplot but I'm still mad it's not in the movie.
Still, they do a great job bringing the big stuff to life - the TriWizard Tournament, the Voldemort confrontation. Although I didn't like the cerebral quality they gave to the maze. It's supposed to be monsters, not their own personal demons. Anyway, aside from this, my only other critique is the director's apparent mis-steps in some seasons. Hermione overreacts here and there, Dumbledore basically attacks Harry in one scene - acts that are largely out of character to the seasoned HP fan, maybe not so for the untrained eye. It feels like Newell didn't get a full grasp of some of the relationships here.
And also, everyone needs a bloody haircut in this movie...
Oh yeah. Screw you, Twilight, for making Cedric Diggory a vampire. We had him first, you jerks.
Movie #259 - Harry Potter & the Prisoner of Azkaban
Harry Potter & the Prisoner of Azkaban
2004 - Rated PG - 2 hr 21 min
Director: Alfonso Cuaron
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Richard Griffiths, Gary Oldman, Bonnie Wright, David Thewlis, Warwick Davis, Alan Rickman, Michael Gambon, Maggie Smith, Robbie Coltrane, Tom Felton, Dawn French, Emma Thompson, Julie Christie, Timothy Spall
Watching these in a row, the actors are growing up right before my eyes. Actually, it's kinda cool. It's also fun to watch the story unfold in succession like this. It's not fun, however, to watch several 2+ hour movies in a row. My butt's starting to hurt somewhere around the end of this movie.
Still, this movie takes a marked turn away from the happy-go-lucky Hogwarts vibe that Chris Columbus established. It's probably got a lot to do with the new director, but it aptly captures the feeling of the third book. Bleak, sad, dreary. It's an important segue for Harry to go from Yay I'm a Wizard! to Crap, Voldemort Wants to Kill Everyone and I have to Stop Him. Rowling does a good job in the series translating this to us and Cuaron was the right guy to take over for this film.
2004 - Rated PG - 2 hr 21 min
Director: Alfonso Cuaron
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Richard Griffiths, Gary Oldman, Bonnie Wright, David Thewlis, Warwick Davis, Alan Rickman, Michael Gambon, Maggie Smith, Robbie Coltrane, Tom Felton, Dawn French, Emma Thompson, Julie Christie, Timothy Spall
Watching these in a row, the actors are growing up right before my eyes. Actually, it's kinda cool. It's also fun to watch the story unfold in succession like this. It's not fun, however, to watch several 2+ hour movies in a row. My butt's starting to hurt somewhere around the end of this movie.
Still, this movie takes a marked turn away from the happy-go-lucky Hogwarts vibe that Chris Columbus established. It's probably got a lot to do with the new director, but it aptly captures the feeling of the third book. Bleak, sad, dreary. It's an important segue for Harry to go from Yay I'm a Wizard! to Crap, Voldemort Wants to Kill Everyone and I have to Stop Him. Rowling does a good job in the series translating this to us and Cuaron was the right guy to take over for this film.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






